Latest Blogs
Popular News
-
Hargreaves Lansdown hits landmark 2m clients
Investment platform and SIPP provider Hargreaves Lansdown has notched up its milestone 2 millionth client and has also seen record assets under management, according to its 2025 Annual Report.
-
Failed SIPP firm clients updated ahead of legal judgment
Clients of failed SIPP provider Hartley Pensions Limited - who have had funds ring-fenced - have been given an update from joint administrators UHY Hacker Young ahead of a legal judgment expected in late October.
-
JPMorgan to replace Nutmeg with new investment platform
JPMorgan is to launch a retail wealth management and investment business with its own DIY investment platform next month.
-
5 year gap between dream retirement age and expectation
While people dream about retiring at 62 they do not expect to be able to retire until they hit 67, according to new research.
-
Sales of escalating annuities surge
Sales of escalating Guaranteed Income for Life annuities that have some inflation protection, accounted for a fifth of all sales in 2024/25 and have increased by 17% year-on-year.
Sipp provider wins legal battle with HMRC
Tribunal judge Heather Gething has ruled in favour of Sippchoice.
The case revolved around whether contributions made by four members of a Sipp were ‘paid’ within the meaning of the Finance Act 2004 and therefore qualified for relief from income tax at source, as claimed by the firm.
From 6 March to 5 April 2016 Sippchoice made a claim for relief from income tax at source relating to a contribution with a net value of £68,342 made by a client called Mr Carlton into a Sipp which was constituted by a Trust Deed and Rules.
The trust had been declared by Sippchoice on 6 April 2009. HMRC denied the claim for relief.
The company contested that decision and included the denied claim in its Annual Relief at Source claim. HMRC decided to refuse that claim and the firm appealed against that decision.
In a ruling, released this week, Judge Gething said that the “meaning of ‘contribution paid’ is wide enough to cover a transfer of assets in satisfaction of a debt as occurred in this case.”
She said: “It seems to me the purpose of the post A day pension legislation was to enable and encourage taxpayers to provide for their retirement and to protect them from the tyranny of interest rates prevailing at the date of retirement -which directly affects the value of an annuity which had to be purchased within a limited period of time following retirement - and the loss of the capital value of the pension pool upon the death of the taxpayer, which has nothing to do with contribution in cash or kind.
“Preventing contributions in kind does not seem to be the mischief at which the legislation was aimed.”
She said: “In any event, the words "monetary contribution" in the Explanatory Note would be wide enough to encompass a monetary amount which is later satisfied by a transfer of shares as occurred in this case.
“The requirement for a monetary value to be stipulated is consistent with the need for the value of the contribution to be known to enable the machinery for granting relief to be implemented.”